Emma Watson Turns 18, Isn’t Dating Harry Potter

April 20th, 2008 // 22 Comments

Hermione’s just turned 18, ya’ll. Here’s the Harry Potter star Emma Watson leaving her 18th birthday party, held at the Automat restaurant in London. She’s giving the paparazzi a decidedly mysterious smile, but recently cleared up any mystery a to whether or not she and co-star Daniel Radcliffe are dating.

According to Watson she is constantly having to answer the question of whether or not she and Radcliffe are romantically involved, “Because it doesn’t happen in the books, everyone is so desperate for it to happen in real life that any opportunity to come up with a story about it is taken.”

And as for clearing up any mystery as to what’s under her skirt, you can just click on one of the thumbnails to have that question answered. I swear, if I ever get famous, I’m only ever going to wear pantsuits and two bras, just to be safe.

Photos: SplashNewsOnline.com/WENN

7 more photos of Emma Watson celebrating her 18th birthday are after the jump.

(Hint: right-click with your mouse to open the thumbnails up in a new window or tab.)

Photos: SplashNewsOnline.com/WENN

By Lisa Timmons
asl

  1. Josh

    I see some hair in pic #2…

  2. Alice

    Josh, girls have hair “down there”. Modern society makes some women feel bad about their body hair, so they wax it completely off their labia.

  3. Eff You

    Oh Christ. This 18-year-old girl is out on her birthday, some scumbag photog grabbed an upskirt shot, and you publish it? You’re dead to me, ASL.

  4. Kittah

    There is something a little [Samantha Ronson-butch] about this er.. young lady.

  5. Disgusted

    I agree with Eff You. How do you publish a photograph like this? She is a young girl, I don’t care if she’s 18 or not. This was in really poor taste.

  6. Baileys

    asking for it asking for it, there were flashes around there were flashes around, asking for it asking for it….

  7. HELLOO OSEA SELE VIO EL CANCHANCHAN A EMMA

  8. Jason Bourne

    Emma is too a good girl with very decent character in reel as well as real life, so such a photo should not have been published at all and be taken off the site ASAP to consolidate the moral standard maintained by her otherwise. We admire your Emma, plz be more careful. Belated happy birthday Hermy. Thanks!

  9. prak

    I love Emma,s body

  10. Ignorance?

    In all honesty. Do you think removing the picture from ONE site is going to keep if off the net?

    It’s already here. No turning back now!

    Or we can just pull a world-wide firesale and see how that goes. (Inevitable failure, I am sure)

  11. RLG

    There was a time when photography and journalism were conducted with honor, intergity, and respect. Today it just seems that anything thatcan be of profit to the papparazzi, then they don’t care who they have to ruin or what they have to do to make a buck nothing will stop them. Then they slap on law suits when they go to far and someone knocks them on their ass they whine and cry and act as if they were violated. How would they like the intimacy of their private lives bombarded by unrespectful, space invading bastards. I for one hope that whom ever took this shot had fun exposing a classy young woman like Mrs Watson, and hope that one day scum like this will not be able to continue to harass people and their privacy.
    This just further goes to show that there should be laws banning public photography unless it is organised and photographers are caged so that the people can be protected. Figured they would have learned after what happened to the late and graceful Princess Diana.

  12. Gwen

    God, I’m sick an tired of the Papparazzi taking upskirt shots of female celebrities.

    I say that photo should be removed from the site. How dare you publish it!

    Let the girl have some dignity and privacy!

  13. bridget

    i agree that there should be a limit to what paparazzi’s take.It is not the web-site that’s the problem.If it wasn’t this site it would be another,blame the guy who took it as SOME of you do.Now we know she is not dating daniel radcliffe hopefuly people will back off.PS Those are here panties not her private.Where are your minds she’s 18yrs and responsible.

  14. bridget

    i agree that there should be a limit to what paparazzi’s take.It is not the web-site that’s the problem.If it wasn’t this site it would be another,blame the guy who took it as SOME of you do.Now we know she is not dating daniel radcliffe hopefuly people will back off.PS Those are here panties not her private.Where are your minds she’s 18yrs and responsible.

  15. gemma

    yeh she is bautiful i wish i could look like her.

  16. gemma

    i think that needs 2 come off

  17. gemma

    i think that needs 2 come off

  18. adam

    its the first ive seen of her all i have to say is give me more pics like this

  19. milly

    that is not her knickers and i love pics like this i think she should do some naked pics

  20. ,n,hj,mnmhmhk

    Josh is stupid

  21. rooo

    que volida …………

    wuoooaaauuuu

    hay q ser p llegr a eso!!!!!

    bueees nadieee es perfecto es el dicho!!!no¿?

    me encanta su forma de ser

    es re linda

    pero no mas linda que yo jeje

    la quiero mucho y espero seguir sus pasos

    besos roOoOoOoo

  22. lucho

    Ema, i think you are a really good girl. i admire you

    all the best

Leave A Comment